Disclosing HIV Status???
Apartments in Brooklyn

Here is an article about disclosing your status to
someone you are having sex with. Brothas, this is nothing to play with. In
many states it is considered a crime of manslaughter with the intent to kill
if you don't tell someone your status.
Public Disclosure of HIV Status: Public Safety or
Breach of Confidentiality?
An
HIV infected man in
Canada was tried for first degree murder and sexual assault
because he had sex with several women without disclosing his status. Two
women from
Toronto became
HIV infected by the man and died of AIDS complications.
The Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) decided to release the man's name
and photo for they claimed were public safety warnings and for matters of
public health. The question is should his name and photo have been released to
the public?
Latest News
A judge from the province of Ontario
ruled that the
HIV positive man would stand trial for first degree murder in the case
of two women with whom he allegedly had unprotected sex without disclosing
his HIV status. Both women died from AIDS complications. Because
of the facts in the crime, the RCMP have released a photo of the man in what
they call an act that protects public health interests.
What's at Stake?
The confidentiality of all
HIV positive people could be at stake. This man's identity and HIV
status has been released to the public, in a direct violation of what many
experts belief to be the man's right to confidentiality. Will this decision
by the RCMP affect other court cases in Canada and around the world? Will
officials be more willing to release the HIV status of people in the name of
public interests or safety?
Pros
By releasing the man's name, photo, and HIV
status, theoretically women and men he may encounter in the future will be
aware of his HIV status and could take the proper precautions in the event
of any sexual contact.
Cons
Disclosing this man's HIV status, name and
photo jeopardizes every
HIV positive person's right to confidentiality. Where will the line
be drawn? When will it be judged to be ok to violate someone's right to
confidentiality? Eventually, the confidentiality of all medical records,
HIV positive and nagative alike could be in jeopardy.
Where it Stands
The trial of this man started March 11, 2006. As
for his confidentiality, the damage has been done, at least in the eyes of
those people who feel confidentiality of HIV status is an absolute with no
room for exceptions. What do you think? Has an injustice been done by the RCMP
or has this man lost his right to confidentiality because of his unwillingness
to disclose his status to sex partners?